CASE RESULTS Our Track Record of Success At Johnson Law, we've secured millions in compensation for injured clients throughout Oregon. While past results don't guarantee future outcomes, they demonstrate our commitment to maximizing recovery for our clients.

Our Approach to Case Valuation
At Johnson Law, we take a comprehensive approach to valuing personal injury cases. We carefully assess all aspects of your damages, including:
- Past and future medical expenses
- Lost wages and loss of earning capacity
- Pain and suffering
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Property damage and diminished value
- Emotional distress
Our attorneys have extensive experience in accurately valuing claims and effectively communicating that value to insurance companies and, when necessary, juries. We fight tirelessly to ensure our clients receive fair compensation for the full extent of their losses.
A.V.L. v. Toyota Driver
Client stopped in traffic when a Toyota Tundra lost control and slammed into his car. Case required extensive trial preparation including focus groups and depositions. Client suffered disc replacement surgery in his neck and laminotomy, foraminotomy, and microdiscectomy surgeries on his lower back. Insurance initially offered nothing before settling for $750,000 plus $40,674 for totaled vehicle.
B.D. v. Distracted Driver
Vietnam War veteran suffered traumatic brain injury when a distracted driver ran a red light and slammed into him. Client fell into a coma and underwent emergency neurosurgery to remove a large subdural hematoma. Insurance initially offered less than $2,500 before settling for policy limits of $450,000.
D.F. v. Delivery Driver
Client crushed between his car door and a rolling truck when a delivery driver left her vehicle in neutral. Suffered concussion and complex spine injuries requiring disc arthroplasty surgery. Case involved multiple defendants including corporate e-commerce entity and logistics company under respondeat superior doctrine.
H.J. v. Reckless Driver
Client suffered broken ribs, punctured lung, broken tooth, and concussion in head-on collision. Five years later required additional shoulder surgeries due to weakened state from original accident. Used Ferrante v. August precedent to hold defendant liable for cascading health complications. Settled for $250,000 plus reimbursement of exhausted PIP benefits.
J.K. v. Box Truck Driver
Delivery truck driver suffered concussion with long-term visual impairment, cervical disc replacement surgery, and shoulder surgery after evasive action in narrow tunnel. Vocational analysis showed no residual earning capacity. Client was primary caretaker for adult son with autism. Settled for nearly $1M for pain, suffering, and economic damages.
K.J. v. Truck Driver
Client thrown around school bus during trailer detachment accident, breaking tooth and tearing meniscus in knee. Driver's actions constituted reckless indifference to unreasonable risk of harm. Strong deposition preparation led to early settlement. Client had difficulty walking down stairs and loved coaching high school football.
S.C. v. Apartment Complex
Tenant fell through rusted playground equipment while playing with her niece. Fracture required invasive surgery and caused client to miss newly hired job. Property management failed to preserve evidence and lacked safety oversight. Settled through mediation after defendants' deposition failures.
K.J. v. City School District
Passenger injured in a T-bone intersection collision with a school bus. Injuries included significant recovery needs.
B.W. v. USPS
Pedestrian injury T-bone collision that resulted in a traumatic brain injury
A.S. v. Unknown Driver
Victim of a hit-and-run collision. Compensation included recovery through uninsured motorist coverage.
C.L. v. Property Owner
A child was injured on dangerous playground equipment. The settlement covered medical expenses and pain and suffering.
W.R. v. Medical Facility
Fall in a medical facility due to wet flooring, leading to hip surgery and long-term recovery.
B.D. v. T.E. et al
T-bone collision that resulted in a traumatic brain injury.
F.S. v. M.D.
Rear-end collision that resulted in a neck injury requiring surgery.
J.D. v. A.F.
This injury resulted from an ATV rollover that resulted from it being overloaded. The client had a crush injury to her leg that required medical attention.
V.G. v. W.S.
T-bone collision resulting in a spinal burst fracture.
J.B. v. R.C.
This claim was the result of a rear end motor vehicle collision that caused nerve impingement.
B.H v. J.D.
This claim was the result of a medical provider failing to timely diagnose a subdural hematoma.
B.B. v. M.D.
This claim was the result of a motorist who made a sudden left turn across traffic, striking a bicyclist and inflicting significant soft-tissue injuries.
D.O v. World Courier
This claim was the result of a courier services' employee illegally using his cell phone when driving. A low back injury resulted that did not require surgery.
B.C v. Fedex
This claim was the result of a Fedex delivery truck crossing the double yellow lines and causing a head on collision. The client suffered serious injury, including permanent sensory deficit.
L.R v. Fedex
This claim was the result of a Fedex delivery truck cutting off traffic and causing a collision. The crash resulted in a cervical compression fracture.
F.S. v. D.K.
This claim was the result of a rear end motor vehicle collision that resulted from a drunken driver. The collision caused a spinal fracture.
J.R. v. Geico
This claim was the result of a rollover accident caused by a drunk driver. The client suffered a complex fracture to his forearm requiring stabilization via a surgical steel rods for months.
J. D. v. Progressive Insurance
This case stemmed from an uninsured motorist claim. Plaintiff suffered a herniated disc, requiring surgery, after being hit by an uninsured driver.
D.A. v. H.I.
Auto crash case involving permanent injury to occipital nerve and a traumatic brain injury. The insurance carrier denied that its insured caused the injuries until after the first day of jury trial. It then tendered its policy limits.
N.W. v. Morquecho
This claim was the result of an ejection from a motor vehicle as the result of an accident caused by a drunk driver. The client suffered a traumatic brain injury, requiring treatment.
D.M. v. Toney
This claim was the result a speed race between vehicles operated by teenage drivers. The client was a passenger in the back seat who suffered a severe dislocation of his shoulder with accompanying neurological deficit as a result of a multiple rollover auto crash.
J.F. v. Danielson
This case involved a bodily injury claim requiring surgery that resulted from a car collision.
R.K. v. Pilot Flying J
Premises liability case stemming from a severe slip & fall resulting in catastrophic injuries at a truck stop.
W.B. v. Vandyke
This case involved a bodily injury claim that was brought on behalf of a driver who was rear ended.
B.K. v. Blue Start Charters & Tours, Inc.
This case involved a property damage claim (diminished value).
D.L. v. American Family Insurance
Wrongful denial of PIP benefits case against American Family Insurance after they denied the client's reasonable and necessary medical bills.
H.I. v. D.A.
Auto crash case involving permanent injury to occipital nerve and a traumatic brain injury. The insurance carrier denied that its insured caused the injuries until after the first day of jury trial. It then tendered its policy limits.
T.G. v. Safeway
Slip and fall case involving dropped produce in a Safeway store's checkout aisle that resulted in serious injuries.
M.B. v. Farmers Insurance
This case stemmed from a motor vehicle collision. Farmers Insurance attempted to low-ball the client during settlement negotiations, so we filed a lawsuit.
A.S. v. K.M
This case stemmed from a motor vehicle collision at a relatively low rate of speed with little property damage. Despite the fact that the client had been injured in a car crash less than a year prior, we were able to negotiate a sizable settlement relative to the type of injury suffered.
Note: These case results represent specific factual and legal circumstances. Results in individual cases will differ based on the unique facts and applicable law. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future cases.
Our Commitment
What We Do And Why
Johnson Law, P.C. brings an award-winning team to every personal injury case we handle.
Fee After Medical Bills
We charge our attorney fee only after your outstanding medical bills have been paid, ensuring your physical recovery remains the priority.
Direct Attorney Access
You'll work directly with the attorney handling your case from start to finish, not be passed off to paralegals or case managers.
Boutique Firm Attention
As a boutique firm, we provide personalized attention and choose to take on fewer cases to ensure each client receives the dedicated representation they deserve.
Trial Experience
While most cases settle, our attorneys have extensive trial experience and prepare every case as if it will go to court, strengthening our negotiating position.
Get Results for Your Injury Case
Let Experienced Trial Lawyers Fight For You
Available 24/7 • No Fee Unless We Win
Over $50 Million Recovered for Oregon Injury Victims